The Brilliance of Twitter Lists and Suggestions for Improvement

Twitter ListsIn my opinion twitter is the best tool we have today to engage with others, spread a message, network, meet other like-minded people, and stay on top of the news, in any industry. The only aspect I’ve always found problematic on twitter was the impossibility of organizing information. This is something that’s changed now with the new twitter lists which allow you to organize people in any sort of list you like.

So how have you been using lists? What sort of names have you been giving your lists?It’s quite interesting to see what lists people have put you under and how you have been “categorized”.  With twitter lists, I can put people I am following into specific categories. So for example, I have created lists of “bloggers”, “social media”, “brands”, etc.

Twitter lists are going to change the way we network and socialize.  No longer are we going to have a list of journalists’ emails to send a press release to but rather we will have a twitter list of all these journalists with their twitter handles. Patrick Kitano writes in his post entitled Twitter Lists will Organize the social graph: “It takes an individual an hour to build a 200-person Twitter List in comparison to the days / weeks it takes to attain a 200-fan FB page. This will make Twitter Lists the prolific standard for organizing the social graph.”

Each of us is organizing his/her own “following” or rather social graph is basically  helping twitter organize its database for them. These lists will become invaluable to us both professionally and socially.  However, please note that one twitter account can only create 20 lists and each list can only contain 500 members, so choose your lists carefully and who’s in them even more carefully.  Robert Scoble wrote an excellent post describing the limitations, bugs, impact and brilliance of twitter lists.

The feature itself I think is revolutionary. The interface and usability? Well, not as great. So here is my top 10 list of  suggestions for improving twitter lists:

10)  Include a “Featured Lists’ section each day/week, based on the user’s interests/preferences

9) Ability to invite people to a private list

8 ) Ability to combine lists

7) Ability to search within specific lists

6) “Ability to build lists by search across following/followers and automatic list creation. For example, I could build an instant list of Berkeley real estate agents by searching “Berkeley real estate” across my following, and clicking a presumed button called “Automatic List”  (Credit: Patrick Kitano)

5) Allow special features for lists, for example: Being able to send a message to all the members of a particular list

4) Allow the ability to decide which lists will display on your sidebar

3) Allow to easily search for people while adding them to lists

2) Ability to add more than 20 lists (perhaps a premium feature?)

1) Ability to add more than 500 members to a list (another premium feature?)

As Scoble writes, what will be the impact of this brilliant feature? “You’ll follow a lot more people. Why? Because you’ll find someone who has done a really great list, say, of programmers, and you’ll add the whole list. I’ve already done this a LOT and found that Twitter has gotten way more interesting because of it.”  Barak Hachamov, founder of My6Sense, a startup that learns users’ behavior over time and prioritizes their information streams for them tells me: This feature is so simple and yet has the potential to have such a huge impact on how people consume and discover real-time information.

I tweeted this week: “It’s no longer about how many followers you have. Now its about how many twitter lists you’re on.” and I stand behind what I said. It doesn’t matter anymore if 100,000 people are following you if you’re not on any one’s list. LindsayT tweeted me saying: “why does this matter? why isn’t the question-how many friends you interact with through this social medium? quality over quantity”. So I answer LindsayT in the most personal of ways: The more lists you’re on, the more you interact with others. People put you on a list because you specifically interact and made yourself a name in that particular category.  Twitter lists are the new measurement these days. Twitter lists are awesome. We will soon enough ask ourselves how we ever lived without them.

Tags: , , , , ,

View Comments to “The Brilliance of Twitter Lists and Suggestions for Improvement”

  1. Alphonse Hà Says:

    I agree. The focus will shift from how many list you are on because there is too many noise.

    Being on a list ensure that you are actually more “listened”.

    Interactivity is important as well but in terms of using Twitter for brands, reach is more important than interactivity. That's the ugly truth. Brands want the target market to interact with them more than they want to interact with their consumers/clients.

  2. ilan peer Says:

    The silver lining: “helping twitter organize its database for them”
    twitter is swarm with chaos in almost every bit of data. it's time for the masses to organize thier sh*t for them!

  3. aunny de la rosa Says:

    Ayelet – I have your solution to #5, for starters. Check out the functionality of the Lunch.com TwitterLists http://www.lunch.com/TwitterEditList. With Lunch you have the ability to describe why you recommend each pick, tweet your list to your followers and @reply to the people on your list.

  4. בלוגיק: נבחרי השבוע מהבלוגספירה הישראלית [06-11-09] | Newsgeek Says:

    [...] נוף כתבה השבוע על השימוש בתכונת הרשימות החדשה שנוספה לטוויטר. בפוסט מסבירה נוף את השימושים השונים של התכונה החדשה [...]

  5. Tzvi Katzburg Says:

    I'm sure that I can follow more people now with lists because I don't have to read all of twits of all the people all the time: I just go to the list that attract me at that moment and that's all. Will it generates more traffic on both sides? I'm not that sure, it can bee a one way ticket affair very easily… and maybe my twitter use is still not my main point of interest, I still count the people… but I think Alphonse is right, the noise will make the shift, not the real use. Like the Wave.

  6. Tzvi Katzburg Says:

    I'm sure that I can follow more people now with lists because I don't have to read all of twits of all the people all the time: I just go to the list that attract me at that moment and that's all. Will it generates more traffic on both sides? I'm not that sure, it can bee a one way ticket affair very easily… and maybe my twitter use is still not my main point of interest, I still count the people… but I think Alphonse is right, the noise will make the shift, not the real use. Like the Wave.

Leave a Reply

blog comments powered by Disqus