Blogs VS Social Networks II
Since some readers have challenged my stance on social networks and their effectiveness in creating friendships, I will repeat here what I have written in my comment to Adi:
“I agree that through blogging I have made many good friends. However, I don’t agree that you cannot make an equal amount of friends on social networks. You simply need to invest more in it. Read people’s profiles, learn about them, get to know them by contacting them, commenting on their posts, etc. I think that perhaps people are just not used to making the same kind of effort on the social networks as they make when reading blogs.”
Kfir writes on his blog:
“I believe that social networks are as good as the way you use them. There are so many of them out there, and every one has its own angle. But I am just one guy, and don’t have a lot of time to spare on maintaining all those profiles (I need to work sometimes). So sometimes I am adding people to my network even if they are far from being friends.”
I believe that one of the reasons that people feel they are not making the same deep connections on social networks as they are through blogging is because they simply don’t invest enough time and effort in getting to know the people in their community. When you enter someone’s blog, you make a conscious effort to sit and read what he has to say, even if it takes a little while. If you spent the same amount of time on social networks, reading people’s posts, getting to know them, writing to them, I can promise you that you’ll make some good connections after all.
I think that a great problem many social networks are facing now is an over saturation of social networks that are very much the same. I have written about this previously in my post I am Thinking of Opening a Startup. Many people feel a constant need to get on every social network out there, not investing enough time and effort on their profiles nor on getting to know others in their community, even if they are listed as their friends. Then all you have is a bunch of online communities filled with people, but no good content or interaction. This is why I believe that those networks that will be the most unique and do the best job in encouraging their users to really get more active and involved, will outlast the others.
The last issue I want to discuss is this: We as humans are not capable of handling the amount of online friendships that we hold. Can you imagine maintaining a good, close level of friendship with all your online friends constantly? It is impossible and I am not telling you to go ahead and do that. However, there are people here and there that will grab your attention, just by skimming through their profile page, you will find bits and pieces that really interest you. You will see that if you invest a little more into those relationships, you may find yourself with a few good new buddies who probably also happen to blog but out of all the millions of blogs out there, never got around to reading yours yet. In the end, making connections is very fulfilling no matter where it takes place. I have met many interesting people through blogging and also through my social networks. I refuse to favor one over the other. I love both. Is that so wrong?
Thanks again to babybluebbw for the pic.
Technorati tags: blogs, social networks, friends, connections, kfir pravda, adi avnit, startups, community, web2.0



May 31st, 2007 at 2:51 pm
I think it’s a matter of the entry bar’s height.
As you wrote yourself, people can join social networks while giving almost no information on themselves, while blogging, by it’s nature, forces them to share.
Blogging has a much higher entry bar than most social networks.
May 31st, 2007 at 4:45 pm
Adi:
I agree with you that in order to blog you need to invest time and energy, and also write well. However, you will also find that on the social networks there are people who invest a great deal in their profiles, maintaining daily posts, pics, videos, contacts, favorite links, etc. Therefore these people should not be dismissed as “lower entry” people.
June 1st, 2007 at 7:52 am
Ayelet
I’m not sure you understand me - bloggers must invest more effort, while people on social networks can do it.
The result is that the chance of encountering a social network page containing meaningful information is lower.
June 1st, 2007 at 7:58 am
Nice post on social networking.
I see networking sites as a jumping boards where one sees some common info about others; like ASL. On the other hand, at blogs, at well meaningful blogs, one can see deep inside the person behind. No?
Here is what I wrote on Social Networking sites:
http://quasifictionalviews.blogspot.com/2007/02/social-networking.html
June 1st, 2007 at 11:34 am
Adi:
You are absolutely right.
All I am saying is that those who do invest more effort in the social networks, are all potential candidates for good, lasting friendships and should not be discounted
June 1st, 2007 at 11:45 am
Dio:
Very interesting post. As you write, social networks play a vital part in our lives today because human beings by nature are social animals. We enjoy meeting others and establishing our reputation in each of these communities.